Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solve the problem of the document field (CPF) blocking even with the empty document. #104

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jailsondamasceno
Copy link

What is the purpose of this pull request?

Solve the problem of the document field (CPF) blocking even with the empty document.

What problem is this solving?

This pull request is for fixing a bug: When deleting the user's document, (CPF) it no longer returns null, but an empty string, with currently validating only null, so the system is blocking the document field even with the empty field. As a result, the user is unable to register the document for the first time.

How should this be manually tested?

  1. Pass the blockDocument property in the declaration of the my-account application in the store

  2. Link the vtex.my-account application to the tksio-549 branch in the my-account module. It is a dependency.

  3. Link the three store / my-account / profile-form repositories and change the property value in the store. By default, the speaker is insufficient.
    If you do not pass the property or pass the false value, the field allows changes.
    If it is set to true and the field still has no saved value, the field will also allow editing, if the field is already saved, the field is blocked.

WS to test

https://profileform--tokstokio.myvtex.com/account/#/profile/edit

Screenshots or example usage

prop

image

Before

image

After

image

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (a non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (a non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Requires change to documentation, which has been updated accordingly.

@vtex-io-ci-cd
Copy link

vtex-io-ci-cd bot commented Mar 18, 2021

Hi! I'm VTEX IO CI/CD Bot and I'll be helping you to publish your app! 🤖

Please select which version do you want to release:

  • Patch (backwards-compatible bug fixes)

  • Minor (backwards-compatible functionality)

  • Major (incompatible API changes)

And then you just need to merge your PR when you are ready! There is no need to create a release commit/tag.

  • No thanks, I would rather do it manually 😞

@jailsondamasceno jailsondamasceno mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2021
4 tasks
Comment on lines 17 to 24
handleChange = e => {
const { field, data, onFieldUpdate } = this.props
const { value } = e.target

const error = data.touched ? applyValidation(field, value) : null
const maskedValue = applyMask(field, value)
const error = data.touched ? applyValidation(field, value) : null
const maskedValue = applyMask(field, value)

onFieldUpdate({ [field.name]: { ...data, value: maskedValue, error } })
}

handleBlur = () => {
const { field, data, onFieldUpdate } = this.props
const error = applyValidation(field, data.value)
onFieldUpdate({
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that there is a problem with the .editorconfig. It has changed from spaces to tabs, it makes harder to understand what was the change...

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has the spacing been changed?

Copy link
Author

@jailsondamasceno jailsondamasceno Apr 7, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@salesfelipe Correct the spacing leaving it as it was in the master. Commited

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](http://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](http://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).

## [Unreleased]

- Added verification if the user's document is empty not only null
Copy link
Contributor

@salesfelipe salesfelipe Apr 6, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a changelog conflict

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants